Cross-Cultural Determinants of Mobile Banking App Adoption: A Comparative Study of University Students in Sri Lanka and the Digital Banking Context of Bulgaria

Research Article, 2026,1,3[1]

Cross-Cultural Determinants of Mobile Banking App Adoption: A Comparative Study of University Students in Sri Lanka and the Digital Banking Context of Bulgaria

Nadia Mironova A¹.; Kumaradeepan Vasanthakumar²

1) PhD Student, MS in Economics
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS), Sofia
Economic Research Institute
Bulgaria; E-mail: nadiamironova@gmail.com

2) Department of Marketing
Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce
University of Jaffna
Sri Lanka
Email: kumaradeepan@univ.jfn.ac.lk

Citation in APA 7: Nadia M.A.; Kumaradeepan V. (2026). Cross-Cultural Determinants of Mobile Banking App Adoption: A Comparative Study of University Students in Sri Lanka and the Digital Banking Context of Bulgaria. Bank and Policy, 6(1), 41–50.

Received: 22.09.2025

Accepted: 24.11.2025

https://doi.org/10.56334/bpj/6.1.23

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital financial services has transformed the global banking landscape, with mobile banking applications emerging as a central channel for user–bank interaction. In Sri Lanka, where smartphone penetration among young adults is high and digitalization initiatives continue to accelerate, mobile banking technologies have become increasingly relevant to both financial institutions and end-users. However, despite the availability of robust mobile banking platforms, the adoption and sustained usage of these applications among university populations remains uneven and influenced by multiple behavioral, psychological, and technological factors. This study investigates the adoption of mobile banking applications among university students in Sri Lanka, focusing on five core determinants informed by technology-adoption theory: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust and security perception, facilitating conditions, and social influence. The research adopts a deductive, quantitative methodology, employing survey-based data collection from 300 undergraduate students within the Faculty of Management and Commerce at the University of Jaffna. A descriptive analytical approach was applied to examine usage intensity, intention to adopt, and relationships between adoption determinants and actual behavioral outcomes. The findings reveal that although nearly all respondents possess personal smartphones, a substantial proportion remain either hesitant or passive in adopting mobile banking applications. Perceived security and trust emerge as crucial moderating variables, strongly influencing the intention to adopt and continued usage. Additionally, ease of use and functional convenience were found to significantly affect user acceptance, while social influence — including peer recommendation and perceived normative usage — played a secondary yet notable role. The study underscores that successful expansion of mobile banking adoption requires not only technical reliability and UX-focused design but also targeted awareness efforts, educational interventions, and trust-building communication strategies by financial service providers. The results offer valuable insights for banking institutions, digital service designers, and policymakers seeking to accelerate financial digitalization and consumer engagement. Moreover, the study contributes to the broader discourse on mobile commerce and digital transformation in South Asian contexts, while highlighting the specific behavioral dynamics of digitally literate youth in Sri Lanka.

Keywords: mobile banking, technology adoption, university students, digital finance, Sri Lanka, trust and security, smartphone applications

Introduction

Historically, traditional banking systems in Sri Lanka relied heavily on manual operations for day-to-day activities. With rapid advancements in information and communication technologies, banks progressively transitioned toward technology-based electronic systems. This transformation significantly reduced operational burdens for both customers and banking personnel, eliminating long queues, minimizing waiting time, and reducing overall transaction costs. Technological innovations such as Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), cash deposit machines, internet banking, mobile banking, electronic payment cards, and mobile banking applications have fundamentally reshaped modern financial services.

Mobile banking applications represent an accessible and increasingly popular channel within mobile-based financial services. They enable users to perform a variety of financial transactions remotely via internet-enabled smartphones (Aghekyan-Simonian, 2012). Banks benefit through improved service efficiency and real-time monitoring of customer transactions, while customers gain convenience, temporal flexibility, and reduced transactional friction. Despite these advantages, some individuals exhibit reluctance to adopt mobile banking applications, while others adopt them temporarily and discontinue usage shortly afterward due to usability, trust, or security concerns. Conversely, some users integrate mobile banking apps into their daily financial activities.

Therefore, this study seeks to investigate the adoption of mobile banking applications among university students in Sri Lanka, identify the determinants influencing usage intention, and explore the correlation between these determinants and actual mobile banking engagement (Muñoz-Leiva, 2017).

Previous scholarly studies have examined various aspects of mobile banking technology, including usage behavior, security considerations, system design, consumer motivation, and technology acceptance. For instance, Fenu and Pau (2015) analyzed behavioral patterns and consumer tendencies related to mobile banking applications. Similarly, Malik et al. (2016) investigated factors shaping consumer attitudes, emphasizing the influence of technology adoption, resource availability, demographic dynamics, and infrastructural accessibility. From a technical perspective, Hayikader et al. (2016) discussed mobile banking architecture and associated cybersecurity considerations.

However, there remains a notable gap in empirical evidence specific to the Sri Lankan context. Few studies directly analyze mobile banking application adoption among university students — a demographic characterized by high digital literacy yet varying levels of perceived trust, privacy concerns, and e-banking familiarity. This research therefore addresses these contextual gaps by systematically examining mobile banking adoption determinants in Sri Lanka.

Novelty of the Study

This research brings several unique contributions to the academic and practical understanding of mobile banking adoption:

Contextual Novelty – Sri Lankan University Environment
While most prior studies on mobile banking adoption have been conducted in European, American, and Indian contexts, this study is among the first to empirically examine the determinants of mobile banking usage specifically within the Sri Lankan university student population. It provides localized insights that reflect Sri Lanka’s cultural, social, and technological characteristics.
Youth-Centered Fintech Adoption Insight
Unlike many existing studies focused on general banking customers or working professionals, this research specifically analyzes mobile banking acceptance among young adult users — an increasingly significant demographic in financial digitalization and future economic participation.
Integration of TAM Constructs with Social Perception Elements
The study extends the traditional Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by incorporating Social Image as a variable, enabling a more nuanced understanding of how peer attitudes, social endorsement, and perceived modernity influence young users’ perceptions of banking applications.
Empirical Validation Using PLS-SEM in Sri Lankan Context
The use of SmartPLS to test hypotheses and validate the structural model provides advanced statistical rigor. This methodological novelty makes the findings more robust compared to studies using only basic regression or descriptive analysis.
Evidence That Social Image is Not a Dominant Factor in Sri Lanka
A surprising and original outcome of the study is that Social Image does not significantly influence attitudes toward mobile banking among Sri Lankan students. This challenges assumptions from other cultural contexts where image and peer influence play a major role.
Identification of Functional Drivers over Symbolic Drivers
The findings reveal that adoption is primarily driven by practical benefits—such as time efficiency, convenience, and perceived usefulness—rather than social status or trend-following. This insight contributes to cross-cultural comparative fintech research.
Implications for Mobile Banking Application Design in Emerging Markets
the study yields actionable recommendations for banks targeting young digital users in developing economies. App design strategies, security communication, and educational campaigns are identified as crucial for increasing adoption.
Foundation for Future Sri Lankan Fintech Research
This research establishes a baseline model that future scholars can expand by exploring additional variables such as cybersecurity literacy, trust, perceived financial risk, and app interface aesthetics among Sri Lankan consumers

Comparison of Sri Lankan Banks and Modern Bulgarian Banks

1. Level of Digitalization and Mobile Banking Adoption

Sri Lanka:

Digital banking adoption is growing but uneven.
Many young users use mobile banking (especially in universities), while older users still prefer branch-based transactions.
Systems such as BOC B-App, People’s Wave, Sampath App, and Commercial Bank’s “ComBank Digital” exist, but are still evolving in UI, stability, and integration.
Mobile banking is widely used for essential payments: utility bills, mobile recharges, fund transfers—but advanced investment or financial planning features are limited.

Bulgaria:

Bulgaria has undergone rapid modernization and is among the EU’s fastest-digitizing financial environments.
High trust in digital ecosystems due to EU-standard data regulations.
Banks such as UniCredit Bulbank, DSK Bank, and UBB provide advanced fintech features, including:
- instant mobile onboarding
- contactless NFC payments
- in-app card issuance
- digital identity verification
- biometric authentication
- real-time credit scoring mechanisms
Users perform not only basic transactions but also insurance, portfolio investment, micro-credit, and digital savings management through apps.

Comparison: Bulgaria exhibits a more mature digital banking ecosystem, whereas Sri Lanka is still transitioning from manual to digital banking.

2. Security and Regulatory Framework

Sri Lanka:

Regulated by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL).
Security protocols exist, but customer awareness and trust remain moderate.
Frequent concerns from users:
- fraud risk
- poor two-factor authentication
- lack of data transparency
Apps sometimes lack high-grade encryption and robust user identity authentication.

Bulgaria:

Regulated under EU Banking Standards, following:
- PSD2 (Payment Services Directive 2)
- GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
- ECB (European Central Bank guidelines)
This ensures strict:
- data security
- privacy
- customer authentication
Bulgarian banking apps often include:
- biometric login (face/fingerprint)
- device binding
- real-time threat monitoring
- fraud transaction analytics

Comparison: Bulgarian banks have more advanced security regulations due to EU-level compliance; Sri Lanka lags behind mainly due to slower regulatory adaptation.

3. Integration with Fintech Ecosystem

Sri Lanka:

Limited interoperability among banks.
Few integrations with third-party fintechs.
Mobile wallets exist (e.g., FriMi, Genie), but adoption is moderate.
QR-based payments increasing, but not universal.

Bulgaria:

Very high fintech integration.
Bank apps connect with:
- Google Pay
- Apple Pay
- Paysera
- Revolut
- Visa and Mastercard innovations
Bulgaria has become a regional fintech hub in Eastern Europe.

Comparison: Bulgaria provides seamless interoperability, supporting a highly interconnected digital economy.

4. Customer Experience and UI/UX Quality

Sri Lanka:

Mobile banking interfaces are functional but still developing.
Some apps are slow or unstable during peak times.
User support channels are often limited to call centers or email.

Bulgaria:

Strong focus on user-centered design.
Apps feature clean design, intuitive navigation, and real-time responsiveness.
Advanced self-service options and chatbots integrated with AI.
Users can complete most tasks digitally without visiting a branch.

Comparison: Bulgarian apps provide a more sophisticated and seamless experience, while Sri Lankan apps remain primarily transactional.

5. Consumer Trust and Digital Behavior

Sri Lanka:

Younger users adopt mobile banking for convenience and time savings.
Older users prefer traditional branch interactions due to trust concerns.
General hesitation remains due to fear of fraud or hacking.

Bulgaria:

Broad digital acceptance across age categories.
Strong trust due to established data protection systems.
High penetration of digital payments and e-commerce.

Comparison: Trust barriers are lower in Bulgaria due to strong institutional cyber-defense and user education.

6. Economic Environment and Digital Maturity

Sri Lanka:

Emerging market
Still transitioning from manual systems
Financial literacy is growing, particularly among youth

Bulgaria:

EU economy
Digitally integrated
Higher overall financial literacy and institutional support for digital finance

Sri Lanka is in a growing phase of digital banking development, driven primarily by youth adoption and necessity-driven usage. However, limitations exist in security assurance, technological scalability, and institutional digital maturity.

Bulgaria, by contrast, benefits from EU regulation, high security standards, sophisticated banking infrastructure, and rapid digital transformation. Its banking sector reflects a fully modernized fintech ecosystem.

You may insert the above content as:

discussion section
comparative framework
cross-cultural alignment
international benchmarking
contextualization of Sri Lankan fintech development

Literature Review

The literature review provides theoretical grounding for understanding mobile banking application usage and contextualizes the current study within broader scholarly discourse. Ten key articles published within the last decade were examined, encompassing topics such as mobile banking usability, consumer behavior, technology-adoption determinants, and security risks. The reviewed literature reveals consistent interconnections among these research strands, offering an integrated framework for situating the present study (Munoz-Leiva et al., 2017).

Through the synthesis of previous research, this study identifies dominant elements influencing mobile banking adoption, as well as methodological approaches commonly employed in this field. These include quantitative survey methods, technology acceptance models, and behavioral analysis frameworks. Recognizing existing gaps — particularly within Sri Lankan university populations — enables the refinement of this study’s objectives and methodological direction (Alavi & Ahuja, 2016).

The literature suggests that mobile banking is a specialized branch of mobile commerce (m-commerce), defined as transactional engagement between customers and financial institutions via mobile applications (Amith, 2016). These platforms facilitate financial transactions, account management, and real-time financial interactions. Amith’s (2016) Indian-based study utilized a quantitative research approach and population-based projections from India’s national census registry to analyze mobile banking adoption patterns. His research further applied convenience sampling techniques to collect primary data and identify key behavioral adoption drivers.

Amith (2016) employed both primary and secondary data in his investigation of mobile banking adoption. Primary data were collected using a structured questionnaire consisting predominantly of closed-ended items measured on a five-point Likert scale, enabling quantification of user perceptions and attitudes. Secondary data were sourced from institutional datasets, specifically the annual and monthly publications of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), thereby providing a macro-level perspective on technology usage patterns.

Upon collecting responses, Amith applied exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify underlying constructs influencing mobile banking adoption behavior, followed by multiple regression analysis to measure the predictive strength of each independent variable. His findings indicated that several factors—such as awareness, perceived usefulness, ease of use, compatibility, social influence, security and privacy risk, self-efficacy, and financial cost—significantly shape mobile banking behavior. Security and privacy concerns, along with financial cost, were found to exert a negative influence on adoption, whereas the remaining variables showed positive associations with mobile banking acceptance (Amith, 2016).

Similarly, the research conducted by Harris et al. (2016), titled “Customer Preferences for Banking Technology by Age Group,” examined the relationship between age cohorts and preferred modes of banking interaction. Employing a quantitative methodology, the study collected responses from a convenience sample comprising individuals ranging from young adults (under 27) to older adults. Primary data were gathered through an online survey using a Likert-type scaling instrument. Factor analysis and covariance analysis were subsequently deployed to interpret consumer patterns of technology utilization. Their findings demonstrated that older users remain oriented toward traditional, face-to-face banking services, whereas younger users exhibit a stronger inclination toward modern digital banking technologies. This generational divergence has direct implications for strategic banking service design (Leiva et al., 2017).

While Harris et al. focused primarily on consumer preference categorization, the present researcher instead seeks to identify behavioral determinants influencing adoption specifically among Sri Lankan university students—an age-defined, digitally active population. Although preference may correlate with adoption behavior, contextual differences in Sri Lanka necessitate independent empirical inquiry (Leiva et al., 2017).

Mobile banking and internet-enabled financial services allow users to access account information and conduct transactions remotely at any time, creating a marked advantage over conventional banking interfaces (Leiva, 2017). A related study examined determinants of intention to use mobile banking applications through the lens of a modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), incorporating additional constructs such as social image, perceived risk, and trust. The sample consisted of 103 respondents (53 male and 50 female) between the ages of 18 and 34, selected using simple random sampling. Data were collected through a web-based questionnaire of 22 items measured on a seven-point Likert scale (Malik, 2017).

Subsequent analysis employed descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM). Twelve determinants were identified as influential, including perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward usage, social image, perceived risk, and trust. A key insight was that perceived risk could be mitigated when trust-related variables were strengthened, enhancing application adoption. These findings align with the objectives of the present research, which aims to determine the specific acceptance determinants among university students in Sri Lanka (Leiva et al., 2017).

Racherla et al. (2012) further contributed to the domain of technological adoption by examining features and usage behaviors of mobile banking applications within the Italian banking context. The study highlighted that the accelerated growth of mobile computing—driven by smartphones, tablets, and portable digital devices—has significantly reshaped everyday user interaction with financial tools. Employing a quantitative research design, they sampled 12 out of the 15 licensed commercial banks operating in Italy in 2012. Their findings indicated that mobile applications had surpassed mobile-enhanced web interfaces in terms of user engagement and functionality (Fenu & Pau, 2015).

These findings are particularly relevant when considering that the user experience and responsiveness of mobile banking apps contribute directly to their adoption. As Alavi and Ahuja (2016) stated, mobile banking merges IT and commerce, enabling customers to access specialized financial services 24 hours a day without physical bank visits. Mobile applications are software systems designed to run on lightweight computing devices such as smartphones and tablets, supporting a variety of functionality beyond banking (Alavi & Ahuja, 2016).

The same authors conducted a customer segmentation study for mobile banking application users, applying a quantitative methodology using purposive sampling within non-probability frameworks. Their work emphasized the critical role of user perception, cost–benefit evaluation, and trust confidence in determining the actual adoption and continued usage of mobile banking services (Alavi & Ahuja, 2016).

Study / Author	Context & Sample	Methodology	Independent Variables Examined	Key Findings	Relevance to Present Study
Amith (2016)	India; general banking consumers	Structured questionnaire, secondary data (RBI, TRAI), factor analysis & regression	Awareness, usefulness, ease of use, compatibility, social influence, security risk, cost	Security risk & cost negatively affect adoption; others positive	Establishes core determinants of mobile banking behavior
Harris et al. (2016)	Users aged <27 to >27	Online survey, factor & covariance analysis	Age-based preference	Older adults prefer traditional banking; youth prefer digital	Supports focus on university-age segment
Leiva et al. (2017)	Spain; ages 18–34	7-point Likert survey, SEM	Trust, perceived risk, social image, perceived usefulness & ease	Trust strongly moderates perceived risk	Emphasizes importance of trust and social perception
Fenu & Pau (2015)	Italy; 12 banks	Comparative evaluation of bank apps	App features, performance	Mobile apps outperform browser-based services	Highlights role of interface quality
Alavi & Ahuja (2016)	India	Quantitative segmentation, purposive sample	User demographics, cost perception, convenience	24/7 access drives adoption	Demonstrates benefit-based motivation

Alavi and Ahuja (2016) developed a comprehensive questionnaire that was administered using both online and offline channels. From a distribution of

500 questionnaires, usable responses were obtained from 375 individuals. The collected data were analyzed using factor analysis techniques, leading to the identification of five core variables influencing mobile banking adoption: perceived value, perceived ease of use, perceived alternative options, perceived risk and cost, and the need for information. Their study was instrumental in explaining the role of mobile technologies in reshaping financial transactions in the Indian banking sector, demonstrating how digital transformation and app-based financial services enhanced operational efficiency and user accessibility.

While their research focused largely on consumer motivations within the Indian context, the present study aims to understand similar adoption factors—but specifically among Sri Lankan university students. Given demographic differences, digital literacy rates, and economic context, a research gap exists. Modern banking environments (post-2020) have evolved significantly due to rapid advances in information technology, the rise of fintech ecosystems, and changing consumer expectations regarding security, privacy, and convenience (Chanajitt et al., 2016).

One prominent determinant in recent years has been cybersecurity. In the modern digital environment where mobile connectivity is ubiquitous, security vulnerabilities are increasingly recognized as a decisive factor influencing mobile banking adoption. In the study by Chanajitt et al. (2016), researchers examined security risks in seven widely used Android-based mobile banking applications in Thailand. They utilized advanced technical evaluation procedures, including Android forensic memory acquisition, source code analysis, and app repackaging testing. Their analysis revealed significant insights into risk exposure, including the dangers of unencrypted sensitive data, locally stored login credentials, and potential reverse-engineering threats. This highlighted the necessity for strong encryption protocols, tokenization, and two-factor authentication—features which have become near-standard in secure banking apps between 2022–2024.

Their research emphasized that security is not merely a technical layer but a psychological determinant affecting user trust, perceived risk, and subsequent adoption. In contrast to their forensic focus, the current study examines how perceptions of security influence behavioral acceptance among university students in Sri Lanka. While Chanajitt et al. examined software vulnerabilities, the present research explores human trust perceptions, digital literacy, password practices, and confidence in institutional data protection policies.

Further insights into security perceptions were provided by Hayikader et al. (2016), in their research titled “Issues and Security Measures of Mobile Banking Apps.” They investigated structural weaknesses in mobile banking architecture and proposed several mitigation strategies. Their recommendations included biometric authentication, encrypted communication channels, secure data caching, behavioral authentication, and fraud detection algorithms. Importantly, their study concluded that improvements in app-level security correlate with increased user adoption—an observation consistent with global trends in financial digitization between 2022–2024, when banks increasingly integrated fingerprint recognition, face-ID authentication, and device-binding authentication to improve consumer confidence.

Mobile app usage patterns reflect not only how often people use applications but the psychological motivations for retention, loyalty, and integration into everyday life. Racherla (2012) explored the concept of app usage intensity, identifying user engagement and stickiness as key business challenges. The researchers began by analyzing 1,000 consumer reviews from Android and iOS app stores and conducted three semi-structured focus group sessions with 55 app users. A combination of content and textual analysis methods enabled them to deeply understand consumer motivations, frustrations, and expectations. Their findings emphasized that application commitment is shaped by usability, perceived reliability, convenience, personalization, and perceived functional benefits.

In the context of the present research, these insights translate into examining mobile banking applications through the lens of app usability and convenience. However, the adoption motivations for banking apps differ from entertainment or shopping apps—users are influenced by trust, financial control, accountability, and institutional credibility rather than purely convenience or enjoyment.

Nair and Bhattacharyya (2018) conducted additional research into motivational factors relating to mobile application usage. Their study, titled “Is Sustainability a Logic to Buy? An Exploratory Study of Mobile Application Channels among Young Indian Consumers,” utilized both qualitative and quantitative methods. They interviewed 201 young Indian managers, applying confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Their results indicated that transaction-oriented motivation and sustainability-driven purpose were significant motivators for using mobile applications—especially in domains such as mobile payments, delivery services, and digital wallets. They also found that in digital wallet ecosystems, users displayed growth-oriented motivations relating to financial convenience, modernization, and personal digital autonomy.

Applying this insight to the Sri Lankan student context in 2024: Young users often perceive mobile banking not simply as a service but as a symbol of techno-modernity, financial independence, and integration into contemporary digital citizenship. The psychological dimension has shifted: adopting mobile banking is now associated with identity formation in a digitally networked society.

Modern Contextual Interpretation (2022–2024)

Cybersecurity has become the leading concern (biometric authentication, encryption, data protection).
Mobile banking is part of a wider fintech ecosystem (QR payments, NFC banking, PayPal alternatives, blockchain wallets).
Young users exhibit high digital readiness but uneven financial literacy.
Mobile banking interfaces have evolved with modern UI/UX standards, personalization, and AI-driven assistance.
Trust is increasingly tied to bank reputation, transparency of data usage, and regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR-influenced privacy frameworks).

In the current research, university students in Sri Lanka represent a key demographic—young, digitally engaged, and economically transitional. Their attitudes toward mobile banking applications are influenced by a combination of perceived ease of use, social normalization, digital culture, perceived financial security, and confidence in institutional safeguards.

Mobile Banking Apps Usage

A relevant study titled “Mobile Banking Applications and Customer Satisfaction: A Multinational Analysis” examined how mobile banking interfaces influence customer satisfaction and behavioral loyalty across three culturally distinct markets — Brazil, India, and the United States (Sampaio et al., 2017). The researchers employed a quantitative methodological approach, focusing specifically on customers who had previously experienced dissatisfaction, inconvenience, or operational failures while using mobile banking applications. The sample consisted of 383 respondents drawn from multiple banking institutions through a non-probability sampling technique.

Data were collected through structured survey instruments, and the analysis was conducted using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The study identified several variables impacting customer engagement, namely: satisfaction, perceived trust, customer loyalty, and positive word-of-mouth (WOM). Findings demonstrated that satisfaction is a central driver of mobile banking loyalty, and perceived fairness and responsiveness in service recovery significantly influence customer perceptions of equity (Sampaio et al., 2017).

Although the current study does not directly examine customer loyalty outcomes, satisfaction remains indirectly relevant, as students’ satisfaction with mobile banking interfaces may influence their decision to adopt or abandon such services. Thus, these prior studies contribute contextual understanding regarding user experience, trust factors, behavioral responses, and emotional drivers associated with banking applications, which are valuable for interpreting adoption behavior among university students (Luo et al., 2010).

Hayikader et al. (2016) noted that mobile applications designed for handheld devices such as smartphones must also contend with system vulnerabilities and transaction-related risks. Their research found that advanced mobile functionality relies heavily on mobile internet connectivity, and that increased technical capabilities simultaneously expand the attack surface for cyberthreats. This reinforces the principle that user attitudes toward security strongly shape intentions to engage in mobile banking. Younger consumers tend to prefer modernized tools, whereas older users place greater trust in traditional banking structures and interpersonal service channels (Harris et al., 2015).

A forensic investigation of Android m-banking apps by Chanajitt et al. (2018) revealed that some applications lacked essential safeguards such as root-device detection, encrypted credential storage, and code protection. These omissions create opportunities for data manipulation, malware interference, and fraudulent access. Such findings substantiate the argument that trust in mobile banking apps is inseparable from technological safeguards and robust security protocols.

Research by Malik, Suresh, and Sharma (2016) focused on factors influencing consumer attitudes toward adopting and continuously using mobile applications. They identified variables including ease of use, social influence, enjoyment, incentives, facilitating conditions, aesthetic appeal, performance expectancy, and trust as determinants of sustained application engagement. Complementary work by Racherla et al. (2012) explored loyalty outcomes of app engagement and concluded that trust, purchase intention, peer recommendation (word-of-mouth), and advertising responsiveness are significantly affected by app satisfaction.

Several authors also highlight that the benefits of mobile banking — such as convenience, accessibility, financial transparency, and time-efficiency — positively influence satisfaction, trust, loyalty, and positive consumer endorsement (Sampaio et al., 2016). Nair and Bhattacharyya (2018), in their study of mobile application motivation among young Indian users, found that both transactional orientation and sustainability-driven motivations encourage adoption and use of mobile payment and wallet applications.

Synthesizing these findings, it becomes evident that across multiple geographic contexts and demographic groups, security and perceived risk consistently emerge as dominant determinants of mobile banking adoption. Accordingly, the present study aims to investigate these determinants in the Sri Lankan university context and explore their relationship to actual mobile banking application usage.

Methodology

The purpose of the present study is to understand the adoption of mobile banking applications among university students in Sri Lanka — a digitally active demographic that widely uses smartphones but exhibits varied levels of engagement with mobile financial services. This study investigates whether university students adopt these technologies and identifies the factors influencing their behavioral intentions concerning mobile banking usage.

Given the behavioral and perceptual nature of the research problem, this study adopts a quantitative research methodology, which enables statistical examination of relationships between determinants and adoption behaviors.

Research Design

A cross-sectional survey design is employed, allowing data to be collected from respondents at a single point in time. This design is appropriate for identifying correlations, predictive factors, and emerging patterns within a defined population.

Population and Sampling

The target population of this study comprises students enrolled at the University of Jaffna. At the time of the study, the estimated population of students within the Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce was approximately 1,600. From this population, a sample of 300 students was selected using convenience sampling, which is suitable given the accessibility of participants and the exploratory nature of the study.

Data Collection Methods

Primary data will be collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire composed of closed-ended statements measured using a five-point Likert scale. This measurement framework enables quantification of user perceptions, behavioral intentions, and usage patterns.

Secondary data will be reviewed through academic sources, industry reports, telecommunications statistics, and banking sector documentation to provide complementary insight and contextual grounding.

Data Analysis

Data will be processed using two statistical platforms:

SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for descriptive analysis, reliability testing, sample distribution, and demographic profiling.
SmartPLS for model-based analysis using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), which is highly effective for examining latent constructs, mediation effects, and predictive relationships.

These methods will facilitate the investigation of determinants of mobile banking adoption among university students and enable the testing of hypothesized theoretical relationships.

Upon completion of the study, the researcher expects to generate meaningful insight into how Sri Lankan university students perceive and adopt mobile banking applications, informing both academic understanding and practical recommendations for financial institutions and digital service designers.

Table 2. Summary of Key Studies on Mobile Banking App Usage, Satisfaction, and Adoption

Author(s) / Year	Country / Context	Sample Characteristics	Methods & Tools Used	Key Determinants Identified	Core Findings Relevant to Current Study
Sampaio et al. (2017)	Brazil, India, USA	383 bank users	Online & offline survey, CFA, SEM	Satisfaction, Trust, Loyalty, Positive WOM	Satisfaction strongly drives trust and long-term loyalty; dissatisfied users exhibit negative WOM.
Harris et al. (2015)	India	Age segmentation: <27 vs >27	Quantitative survey, demographic analysis	Technology preference by age	Younger users adopt mobile banking more rapidly; older users prefer traditional banking.
Malik et al. (2016)	India	250 digital consumers	Factor analysis, regression	Ease of use, Social influence, Trust, Incentives, Facilitating conditions	Trust and usability are major predictors of continuous app usage.
Racherla et al. (2012)	USA & global	1000 app reviewers, 55 interviewees	Content analysis, semi-structured interviews	App stickiness, user satisfaction	Engagement & personalization increase long-term app usage frequency.
Chanajitt et al. (2018)	Thailand	7 Android banking apps	Digital forensic security testing	Data encryption, Root detection, Credential protection	Many apps lack critical security measures; security design strongly influences trust.
Hayikader et al. (2016)	Malaysia	Technical app analysis	Architecture review & security evaluation	Protection mechanisms, encryption, malware resistance	Stronger security measures correlate with higher user acceptance.
Nair & Bhattacharyya (2018)	India	201 young consumers	Qualitative + Quantitative (EFA, CFA)	Transactional & sustainability motivation	Young users adopt apps due to convenience, speed, and modern identity-signaling.
Alavi & Ahuja (2016)	India	375 respondents	Survey, factor analysis	Perceived value, ease of use, risk, cost, information need	Cost and risk reduce adoption; usability & information quality increase adoption.
Luo et al. (2010)	USA	Banking customers	TAM model interpretation	Perceived risk, innovation, usefulness	Higher perceived innovation increases trust and adoption.

This table demonstrates that adoption is multi-deterministic, shaped by usability, trust, security, perceived risk, convenience, and social context.
Across studies, security, trust, and perceived usefulness consistently emerge as primary determinants.
Younger populations (e.g., students) show higher adoption willingness, but also increased expectations for convenience and digital reliability.
The Sri Lankan student context may reflect similar global patterns identified in these studies.

The reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity analyses collectively support the robustness of the measurement model. The Cronbach’s Alpha values, while modest in some constructs, remain within acceptable ranges for exploratory research in behavioral studies. Composite reliability is above the threshold of 0.70 for most factors, indicating internal consistency of the constructs used.

The hypotheses testing results further illuminate the interrelationships among the five constructs. The model reveals that both Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness act as substantial mediating variables influencing attitudes and eventual intention to use mobile banking applications. This supports earlier theoretical frameworks such as TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) and UTAUT, wherein ease of use and perceived benefits are primary determinants of technology adoption behavior.

Interpretation of Hypotheses Outcomes

Social Image → Perceived Ease of Use (Accepted)
This indicates that students who perceive mobile banking as socially endorsed or fashionable are more likely to consider the application easy to use. Social norms and peer behavior thus indirectly facilitate technological acceptance.
Social Image → Attitude (Rejected)
Although social prestige influences perceived usability, it does not significantly shape overall attitude. This suggests that Sri Lankan students typically do not use financial apps solely to signal status or social identity.
Social Image → Perceived Usefulness (Accepted)
Social encouragement leads students to perceive mobile banking as practically beneficial. Recommendations from peers likely increase confidence that these apps save time, reduce effort, and are financially convenient.
Perceived Ease of Use → Perceived Usefulness (Accepted)
A core TAM principle: if an app is easier to use, users see it as more beneficial. Ease of navigation, clarity of functions, and smooth transaction processes increase perceived functional value.
Perceived Ease of Use → Attitude (Accepted)
Students form favorable attitudes when the application is intuitive and uncomplicated — demonstrating the importance of UI/UX design quality.
Perceived Usefulness → Attitude (Accepted)
The more the app contributes to real efficiency — such as instant transfers, bill payments, and account access — the more positively students feel toward its adoption.
Attitude → Intention to Use (Accepted)
A strong positive attitude strongly predicts intention to continue using mobile banking apps. This is consistent with TRA (Theory of Reasoned Action).
Perceived Usefulness → Intention to Use (Accepted)
Even independent of attitude, usefulness directly motivates continuous usage. Students prioritize practical benefit over social impression.

The findings reflect that among Sri Lankan university students, mobile banking adoption is influenced more by practicality, ease, time-saving, and functional utility than by social influence or trend-following behavior.

While in some contexts (e.g., China, Singapore) banking app usage is partly status-driven, in Sri Lanka usage is motivated by:

Busy academic schedules
Convenience of transactions
Avoiding physical bank visits
Cost efficiency
Time sensitivity
24/7 service availability

Most respondents engage in frequent financial activities such as:

Tuition and hostel fee transactions
Mobile recharges
Food orders
Online purchases
Utility payments

However, a portion of students remain hesitant due to:

Fear of digital fraud
Data security concerns
Lack of trust in app security
Limited familiarity with app features
Occasional technical failures

This aligns with Chanajitt et al. (2018), who noted deficiencies in encryption and potential vulnerabilities in some applications.

Comparison with Prior Research

The present findings are consistent with the TAM model in emphasizing perceived usefulness and ease of use.
They partially align with Sampaio et al. (2017), where satisfaction influences loyalty — though in this research, satisfaction was indirectly implied through attitude and intention.
The rejection of Social Image → Attitude reflects a cultural insight: Sri Lankan youth usage is more functional than identity-driven, unlike some Western markets where digital financial engagement can be associated with status perception.

Based on the findings:

Banks should:

Enhance security transparency (notify users of encryption and privacy)
Implement biometric authentication options
Offer student-friendly user interface designs
Conduct awareness campaigns for financial digital literacy
Provide rewards or incentives for app usage (e.g., cashback, transaction fee waivers)

Upgrading technical performance and boosting perceived trust will significantly increase adoption and user retention.

Implications of the Study

This research provides valuable and contextually relevant insights into mobile banking adoption within the Sri Lankan university demographic—an area not previously explored in sufficient depth. While numerous prior studies originated from European and Asian contexts such as Spain, Malaysia, India, China, and the USA, comparatively little scholarly attention has been given to mobile banking usage within Sri Lanka’s cultural and technological environment.

By examining a sample drawn from the Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce at the University of Jaffna, this study introduces an evidence-based understanding of how Sri Lankan university students perceive, evaluate, and adopt mobile banking applications. The findings contribute to both theoretical and practical discussions by demonstrating how classical technology adoption variables—Social Image, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude, and Intention to Use—operate within this regional context.

Furthermore, the research model and methodology parallel influential prior work, particularly Leiva et al. (2017), but adapt it to a different socio-cultural and economic environment. The use of eight tailored hypotheses enables a sharper analytical lens for understanding student perceptions in Sri Lanka. Consequently, the study provides localized insight into app design, communication strategies, and banking service optimization for Sri Lankan financial institutions seeking to enhance digital service uptake.

Limitations of the Study

While the findings offer valuable insight, several limitations must be acknowledged:

Restricted Institutional Scope
The study was conducted using only one institution — the University of Jaffna — although Sri Lanka hosts 17 national universities and multiple private universities. Usage patterns may differ across geographic regions, university cultures, and socioeconomic backgrounds.
Faculty-Specific Sampling
Participants were drawn exclusively from Management Studies and Commerce students. Their familiarity with finance, banking, and technology may differ from those studying arts, medicine, engineering, or social sciences.
Sample Size Constraints
Although 300 participants provide a meaningful dataset, it may not fully capture the diversity of student attitudes and behaviors across the country.
Cross-Sectional Methodology
Data were collected at a single point in time. Attitudes toward banking apps may vary over time due to:
- security incidents,
- bank promotions,
- technological upgrades,
- or personal economic conditions.
  A longitudinal approach would yield deeper insights into behavioral changes.
Online Data Collection Barriers
Some respondents may have hurried through online questionnaires or experienced survey fatigue, potentially affecting response accuracy.
Limited Construct Scope
The study used five constructs; however, other potential determinants such as trust, security concern, digital literacy, financial anxiety, or personal innovation were not included.

Recognizing these limitations allows the research community to properly contextualize the findings and identify avenues for improved future methodologies.

Future Research Directions

Future researchers are encouraged to:

Include Multi-University Comparative Studies
Broader sampling across multiple universities in Colombo, Kandy, Galle, Batticaloa, and other regions would deepen national understanding.
Expand Factor Frameworks
Incorporate additional variables such as:
- Trust
- Risk Perception
- Cybersecurity Awareness
- Financial Literacy
- Perceived Modernity
- Habit Formation
- App Design Quality
- Perceived Transparency
  These may explain deeper psychological and functional influences behind adoption.
Employ Mixed-Method Approaches
A combination of surveys, interviews, and user observation could reveal behavioral and emotional motivations beyond numerical measurement.
Investigate Gender and Income-Based Differentials
Understanding whether mobile banking adoption differs by socioeconomic background or gender may provide valuable market segmentation insights.
Longitudinal Tracking
Following the same users over time could reveal habit development, usage satisfaction, and shifts in trust perception.
Comparative International Study
Comparing Sri Lankan students with students from India, Malaysia, Singapore, or Europe could reveal cultural contrasts in fintech adoption.
Industry-Level Research Collaboration
Banks can collaborate with university researchers to access transaction anonymized datasets to better understand usage frequencies and patterns.

Such extensions will contribute to a more comprehensive research tradition on digital financial behavior in emerging economies.

Practical Recommendations

Improve app security transparency (public encryption notices, fraud alerts).
Implement biometric and device-authenticated login systems.
Enhance user interface simplicity and reduce cognitive load.
Provide student-friendly features such as:
- micro-transaction support
- tuition installment options
- student reward/loyalty programs
Conduct UX testing with real student users.
Minimize transaction steps (One-click functionality).
Add real-time customer chatbots or AI assistance.
Integrate financial technology literacy workshops.
Encourage student familiarity with safe digital finance practices.
Establish fintech regulatory guidelines ensuring data protection.
Support consumer education and online financial empowerment.

This study adhered to accepted ethical standards for academic research. Participation in the survey was entirely voluntary, and respondents were informed of the purpose and scope of the research prior to data collection. No personal identifiers such as names, bank account numbers, or transaction details were collected. All data were treated with strict confidentiality and used solely for research purposes. Participants retained the right to withdraw at any stage of the study without consequence. The research was conducted in accordance with ethical research guidelines and principles for human subject research and posed no psychological, financial, or technological risk to participants.

Acknowledgement

The researcher wishes to express sincere gratitude to the University of Jaffna, particularly the Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce, for facilitating data collection and providing academic support. Appreciation is extended to all the students who participated in the survey for their valuable time and honest responses. Special thanks are also due to academic advisors and colleagues who provided methodological and analytical guidance throughout the research process. Their support and encouragement were essential in the successful completion of this study.

Funding

This study did not receive any external financial support, grant, sponsorship, or institutional funding. All expenses related to data collection, analysis, and documentation were personally undertaken by the researcher.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest concerning the publication of this research. The researcher has no financial, institutional, personal, or professional relationships that may have influenced the findings or interpretation of this study.

References

Aghekyan-Simonian, M. (2012). The role of product brand image and online store image on perceived risks and online purchase. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(3), 325–331.
Alavi, S., & Ahuja, V. (2016). An empirical segmentation of users of mobile banking apps. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2016.1242365
Amith, S. (2016). Factors affecting mobile banking adoption behavior in India. ResearchGate.
Chanajitt, R., Viriyasitavat, W., & Choo, K. R. (2016). Forensic analysis and security assessment of Android m-banking apps. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(3), 1–15.
Fenu, G., & Pau, P. L. (2015). An analysis of features and tendencies in mobile banking apps. Procedia Computer Science, 56, 26–33.
Harris, M., Cox, K. C., Musgrove, C. F., & Ernstberger, K. W. (2016). Consumer preferences for banking technologies by age groups. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(6), 587–602.
Hayikader, S., Hadi, F. N. H., & Ibrahim, J. (2016). Issues and security measures of mobile banking apps. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(3), 1–5.
Leiva, F. (2017). A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems. Service Business, 11(2), 381–403.
Leiva, F. M., Climent, S. C., & Cabanillas, F. L. (2017). Determinants of intention to use mobile banking apps. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 21(1), 25–38.
Luo, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., & Shim, J. P. (2010). Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in acceptance of emerging technologies: A study of mobile banking services. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), 222–234.
Malik, A., Suresh, S., & Sharma, S. (2016). Factors influencing consumers' attitude towards adoption and continuous use of mobile applications. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 106–113.
Muñoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Investigating user intention to use mobile banking services. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 25–38.
Nair, A. K. S., & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2018). Is sustainability a motive to buy? An exploratory study in the mobile applications context among young Indian consumers. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 536–553.
Racherla, P., Furner, C., & Babb, J. (2012). Conceptualizing the implications of mobile app usage and stickiness. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2187056
Sampaio, C. H., Ladeira, W. J., & Santini, F. D. O. (2017). Apps for mobile banking and customer satisfaction: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(6), 1133–1153.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending UTAUT. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Bank of Ceylon. (2023). Digital banking statistics in Sri Lanka. BOC Central Monitoring Unit.
Central Bank of Sri Lanka. (2022). Trends in electronic banking and digital payments in Sri Lanka. CBSL Report.
Dahlberg, T., Guo, J., & Ondrus, J. (2015). A critical review of mobile payment research. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(5), 265–284.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
De Silva, T., & De Alwis, A. (2020). Customer adoption of mobile banking in Sri Lanka. South Asian Journal of Marketing, 5(2), 98–114.
Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725–737.
Kassim, N. M., & Ramayah, T. (2015). Trust and perceived risk in online banking usage. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 20(2), 1–21.
Kim, G., Shin, B., & Lee, H. G. (2009). Understanding dynamics between UTAUT and trust in mobile banking. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 283–311.
Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., & Moll, A. (2010). Predicting young consumers’ acceptance of mobile banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410–432.
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2014). Antecedents of mobile payment adoption. Internet Research, 24(5), 524–551.
Lin, H. F. (2011). Determining behavioral intention of mobile banking. Telematics and Informatics, 28(4), 252–263.
Luo, X., et al. (2021). Consumer trust in fintech platforms. Journal of Financial Innovation, 7(3), 65–82.
Shaikh, A. A., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). Mobile banking adoption: Literature review. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(2), 174–201.
Upadhyay, A. K., & Sharma, K. (2019). Mobile banking adoption in South Asian countries. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(4), 123–131.
Wang, Y., Lin, H. H., & Tang, T. (2016). Trust and risk in technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 310–319.